<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>Education on IT News</title>
    <link>https://it-news.uk/tags/education/</link>
    <description>Recent content in Education on IT News</description>
    <generator>Hugo</generator>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0800</lastBuildDate>
    <atom:link href="https://it-news.uk/tags/education/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
    <item>
      <title>Fudan University Tried Something Different for Its AI Exam — Students Had to Make the AI Score Zero</title>
      <link>https://it-news.uk/posts/fudan-ai-exam-students-stump-models/</link>
      <pubDate>Sun, 05 Jul 2026 00:00:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://it-news.uk/posts/fudan-ai-exam-students-stump-models/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Fudan University tried something different for its &amp;ldquo;Data Mining Techniques&amp;rdquo; final exam this semester. Nobody sat at a desk filling out an answer sheet. Instead, every student became the examiner — with the job of writing questions specifically designed to make AI models fail.&lt;/p&gt;&#xA;&lt;p&gt;The premise was simple: each student submitted 10 original calculation problems in data mining, each with a single correct answer and a complete derivation. Then those questions were fed to three AI models at different capability levels. The more questions an AI got wrong, and the stronger the model it stumped, the higher the student&amp;rsquo;s score.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>UCL study finds blanket smartphone bans in schools may backfire</title>
      <link>https://it-news.uk/posts/school-smartphone-bans-may-backfire-ucl-study/</link>
      <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2026 00:00:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://it-news.uk/posts/school-smartphone-bans-may-backfire-ucl-study/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;School districts across the world have been racing to ban smartphones from classrooms. But new research from University College London suggests the rush might be making things worse, not better.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>When AI Makes Your Thesis Sound More AI-Generated: CCTV Explains the Paradox of AIGC Detection</title>
      <link>https://it-news.uk/posts/ai-thesis-detection-paradox/</link>
      <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 21:36:00 +0800</pubDate>
      <guid>https://it-news.uk/posts/ai-thesis-detection-paradox/</guid>
      <description>&lt;p&gt;Imagine you&amp;rsquo;re a university graduate who just ran your thesis through an AIGC (AI-generated content) detection tool. The result: 62% AI rate — a staggering 47 percentage points above your school&amp;rsquo;s 15% threshold. Panicked, you turn to a large language model and ask it to &amp;ldquo;rewrite this paper to sound like a human wrote it.&amp;rdquo; You run the revised version through the same detector. The result: 94%.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>
